General Assembly 6-2
That RSPO establish a Protocol for Development, Review and Amendment of RSPO Standards, Guidelines and Procedures.
Rejected
| for | 52 | |
| against | 60 | |
| abstain | 40 | |
| spoilt | 0 | |
| Total Vote | 152 | |
6 components:
- The first calls for the process to be prudent, fair, balanced, participatory, transparent and accountable.
- the need for a time frame for review, amendment and revision of the generic standards after at least a five-year implementation period.
- the review team should reflect the composition of RSPO membership.
- Consultation should involve those parties most affected by the issues under review.
- National laws and regulations should be taken into account and any proposed recommendations should be based on wellaccepted methodologies including field testing and validation.
- The first calls for the process to be prudent, fair, balanced, participatory, transparent and accountable.
- the need for a time frame for review, amendment and revision of the generic standards after at least a five-year implementation period.
- the review team should reflect the composition of RSPO membership.
- Consultation should involve those parties most affected by the issues under review.
- National laws and regulations should be taken into account and any proposed recommendations should be based on wellaccepted methodologies including field testing and validation.
-
ProponentGAPKI, MPOA, IOPRI
Request for more info
Fill out the form and we will get back to you shortly